Publications

2025

Social Inclusion
2025 - n° 293

Unlocking the potential of all EU citizens is not only a social imperative—it is an economic necessity if we want the EU to remain globally competitive. A commentary by Mario Nava, Director-General, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission  

Mario Nava
Social Inclusion
2025 - n° 289

The European Commission is working on its forthcoming anti-poverty strategy. A successful Italian experiment offers a potential large-scale solution. A commentary by Michela Carlana

Michela Carlana
Digital & Innovation
2025 - n° 288

Our technologies advance faster than our understanding of them – and that widening epistemic gap may pose humanity’s greatest risk. A commentary by Joel Mokyr, 2025 Nobel Laureate in Economics.

Joel Mokyr
Financial Markets
2025 - n° 287

By most fundamentals, the single currency should be weakening, yet it keeps rising against the dollar and other major currencies. It may have to do with the ECB’s monetary stance. A commentary by Lorenzo Bini Smaghi

Lorenzo Bini Smaghi
Financial Markets
2025 - n° 284

The euro–dollar exchange rate has returned to its 1999 debut level as Trump’s policies unsettle markets and reopen questions about the balance of power between the two currencies. A commentary by Ignazio Angeloni

Ignazio Angeloni
Eu governance
2025 - n° 250

For the first time, the EPP can forge shifting coalitions with partners whose visions for Europe are fundamentally at odds—paralysing policy-making and exposing the Union’s underlying fragility. A commentary by Marco Buti, and Marcello Messori

Marco Buti, Marcello Messori
Digital & Innovation
2025 - n° 245

Competitiveness has returned to the top of the EU agenda, with the EU Competitiveness Compass highlighting the need for innovation-driven growth. But European industry has fallen behind in innovation by specializing in mid-tech industries, now increasingly subject to Chinese competition.

Since the start of Horizon 2020, the EU budget has provided about €100 billion to support research and innovation. But this seems to have had little impact.

A large proportion of Horizon funding has gone to a small number of big corporations with modest innovation and growth performance. Another sizable share goes to SMEs that are part of wider corporate groups.

Moreover, the lion’s share of Horizon funding has gone to collaborative programs, with detailed guidelines on research topics and expected outcomes, typically involving broad-based consortia with more than 20 participants. Yet our analysis suggests that bottom-up programs undertaken by individual recipients yield better results, but only if the recipients are independent SMEs.

Any new Framework Program should thus focus on funding ideas, not companies. They key is not more money, but rather leaving space for disruptive innovation by encouraging bottom-up initiatives, especially by small independent companies.

Clemens Fuest, Daniel Gros, Philipp-Leo Mengel, Giorgio Presidente, Cristina Rujan
Eu governance
2025 - n° 234

A message from the President of the Republic of Italy Sergio Mattarella on the occasion of the annual event of the Institute for European Policymaking

Sergio Mattarella
Sergio Mattarella
Eu governance
2025 - n° 232

A great legacy of the European Council of Milan is the image of a Europe that does not need to be either unanimous or uniform in order to proceed toward its development, precisely insofar as one can trust one another. A commentary by Marta Cartabia

Marta Cartabia
Financial Markets
2025 - n° 227

Eurobonds can be issued to provide new resources or to become the safe asset for the European financial market, not both. A commentary by Lorenzo Bini Smaghi

Lorenzo Bini Smaghi
Eu governance
2025 - n° 225

At the June 1985 European Council meeting, in Milan, the diverging views about the future of Europe – its identity as a common trading area or as a more cohesive bloc – were bound to clash strongly, given the fact that the meeting was intended to consider various proposals for the reform of the European institutions. A paper by Andrea Colli

Andrea Colli
Eu governance
2025 - n° 223

At the Castello Sforzesco, in the 1985 meeting, the European Council agreed with the Commission’s conclusion that an internal market could provide the economic and social “crisis management” the Community needed and secure its global economic competitiveness. A paper by Grace Ballor

Grace Ballor
Eu governance
2025 - n° 218

While the proof of the pudding will be, as always, in the eating, the UK-EU 19 May Summit can justly be said to have laid out an enticing menu. A commentary by Sir Alan Dashwood

Alan Dashwood
competitiveness
2025 - n° 217

In this paper, we unpack the logic—and the unintended fallout—of the Trump administration’s tariff strategy. We present our analysis as an imagined conversation between President Trump and the late historian Carlo M. Cipolla. A paper by Marco Buti and Marcello Messori

Marco Buti, Marcello Messori
war Ukraine elections
2025 - n° 205

To restart growth, the EU needs to focus on productivity and innovation. This does not require hundreds of billions of euros in new expenditure, but rather a sharp focus on the efficiency of existing budgets coupled with innovation-friendly rulemaking. A Policy Brief by Daniel Gros, and Jacob Funk Kirkegaard 

Daniel Gros, and Jacob Funk Kierkegaard
competitiveness
2025 - n° 197

Direct public subsidies to Chinese BEV producers in the forms of grants and tax breaks are relatively small. The Commission motivates a large part of the countervailing duties (CVD) with the argument that entire markets in China are so distorted by industrial policies that the Chinese BEV producers do not face market prices for credit and batteries. A Policy Brief by Daniel Gros, and Weinian Hu 

Daniel Gros, Weinian Hu
2025 - n° 196

Is the world de-globalizing? Is the global economy fragmenting along geopolitical lines? This article provides an overview of the available empirical evidence on de-globalization and fragmentation. A working paper by Italo Colantone

Italo Colantone
competitiveness
2025 - n° 191

The intrinsic contradictions of Trump’s strategy will strike the United States where it is most vulnerable: inflation and employment. In the ensuing moves of this chess game, it is vital to project both strength and flexibility. A commentary by Ignazio Angeloni

Ignazio Angeloni


The Institute for European Policymaking (IEP@BU) publishes a range of content formats to advance rigorous, policy-relevant research and foster informed public debate on European affairs. Our publications—authored by IEP fellows, affiliated researchers, and external contributors—reflect the Institute’s commitment to analytical depth, relevance, and independence.


Types of Publications
 

● IEP produces and disseminates the following categories of content:
● Commentaries (max. 900 words): Short opinion pieces on timely policy debates, published under the responsibility of the Director and Communications Advisor.
● Interviews with policymakers, scholars, and thought leaders.
● Event-related content: Includes event presentations, slide decks, and videos
● Policy Briefs: Policy-oriented documents comprising an executive summary and a full-length PDF, offering actionable insights and recommendations.
● Working Papers: Original research products developed within IEP-supervised or funded projects.
● Co-authored Reports: Collaborative publications with external institutions on major policy issues.


Approval and Editorial Process


IEP’s editorial process balances academic freedom with internal quality control. The following procedures apply:
● Commentaries, interviews, and event-related content are reviewed by the Director with the support of the Communications Advisor.
● Policy Briefs and Working Papers: The Director approves the publication after an internal review process that includes soliciting feedback and comments from the full Managing Board, and occasionally from IEP fellows with subject-matter expertise.
● Reports are long-term projects pre-approved by the Managing Board and supervised by the Director or another Board member throughout their development.


Definitions


● A Working Paper is a research product that originates from a project initiated, funded, or supervised by IEP. It reflects IEP authorship and resource investment, and typically includes at least one internal presentation to the IEP community during its development or prior to publication.
● A Policy Brief is a concise, policy-focused publication designed to inform public discussion or decision-making. It includes a stand-alone executive summary and a full document in PDF format. Policy Briefs may be discussed in digital or hybrid events, either before or after publication.
● A Report is a digital publication co-authored by IEP fellows and members of other research institutions. Reports address major issues in the European policy debate that require a comprehensive approach, and they offer a broad set of policy recommendations.
 

If you want to submit a commentary or a proposal for a Policy Brief or other projects, please write to iep@unibocconi.it

IEP@BU Contributors